EVICTED! : Property Rights and Eminent Domain in America by David Schultz

KF 5599 .S38 2010

“The 2005 Supreme Court decision, Kelo v. City of New London, which upheld the taking of an individual’s home by local government for the sake of private development, unleashed a firestorm of controversy.  The backlash against eminent domain cuts across partisan, ideological, and racial lines, with four out of five Americans opposing Kelo.  Critics of Kelo claim that it represents a radical departure in the law, putting every homeowner in jeopardy of dispossession by government at the service of corporate interests.  But are property rights and eminent domain truly in mortal conflict?  Written for general readers, property owners, and local government officials seeking to understand the implications of Kelo for eminent domain and property law, Evicted: Property Rights and Eminent Domain in America cuts through all the hype and hysteria surrounding Kelo and argues that the alleged wave of eminent domain abuse is mostly a myth.

Evicted! describes what property rights are, why the law protects them, and how eminent domain really works.  Schultz shows that Kelo did not make new law but only broadened Supreme Court precedents, and he refutes claims that Kelo has opened the way to widespread eminent domain abuse.  Nevertheless, the author identifies certain legislative changes that are needed at the local, state, and national levels to better protect individual property owners when corporate thugs and corrupt government officials occasionally gang up against them.” – publisher description


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s